CHAPTER 10: Planning & Implementation |
AMENDMENTS
This chapter was revised in August 2010 to take account of the changes in Working Together to Safeguard Children 2010. The specific changes are in paragraphs 3.1, 3.15 and 3.22 and are shown in italics. In addition, the term 'Keyworker'' has been changed to 'Lead Social Worker' throughout the chapter.
Contents
1. Introduction
| 1.1 | The Integrated Children's System provides for the use of a 'child's plan' for all Children in Need who are not being Looked After or leaving care. Children's Social Care is responsible for ensuring these plans are developed and implemented. A Child's Plan should identify how the following will be addressed:
|
| 1.2 | The plan, using the appropriate pro-forma, should be specific about the actions to be taken, identifying who is responsible for them, services / resources required, planned outcomes and agreed time-scales. |
| 1.3 | An Initial Child's Plan or a Child's Plan should be developed for those Children in Need where
|
| 1.4 | Further information on Initial and Child's Plans will be found in the local Children's Social Care child care procedures. |
| 1.5 | Where a child protection conference has been held and an outline Child Protection Plan agreed for a child, a Child Protection Plan must be implemented. The procedures for these are in this chapter. |
| 1.6 | A Lead Social Worker from Children's Social Care is appointed to co-ordinate and lead all aspects of the inter-agency Child Protection Plan and the forum to undertake this co-ordinated multi-agency work is the Core Group, whose membership will have been identified at the child protection conference. |
| 1.7 | Family Group Conferences (FGCs) may be used both as part of a Child's Plan and as part of a Child Protection Plan . |
2.
Core Group
Responsibilities |
|
| 2.1 | The Core Group is responsible for the formulation and implementation of the detailed Child Protection Plan, previously outlined at the conference. |
| 2.2 | All members of the Core Group are jointly responsible for:
|
| 2.3 | Where any member of the Core Group is aware of difficulties implementing the Child Protection Plan due to changed or unforeseen circumstances, the Lead Social Worker must be informed immediately and consideration given to recalling the Core Group meeting to re-consider the Child Protection Plan. |
| 2.4 | Circumstances, about which the Lead Social Worker should be informed, include inability to gain access to a child subject to a Child Protection Plan, for whatever reasons, on 2 consecutive home visits. |
| 2.5 | If the difficulty in implementing the Child Protection Plan impacts on the safety of the child, the Lead Social Worker and all Core Group members should consider the need for a Section 47 Enquiry and / or bringing forward the date of the Child Protection Review Conference and / or for immediate legal action. |
| 2.6 | If members are concerned that there are difficulties implementing the Child Protection Plan arising from disagreement amongst professional agencies or a Core Group member not carrying out agreed responsibilities this must be addressed by:
|
| 2.7 | For additional information see Complaints, Non-Compliance and Conflict Resolution Procedure. |
|
|
| 2.8 | Membership of the Core Group will have been identified at the Child Protection Conference and must include the Lead Social Worker / Lead Social Worker's manager as chair. |
| 2.9 | It will include parents/carers, child (if appropriate) and other relevant family members. |
| 2.10 | Professionals and foster carers in direct regular contact with the child should also be included. |
|
|
| 2.11 | The date of the 1st Core Group meeting must be set at conference and take place within 10 working days of an initial conference. Review conferences will clarify the date of the next Core Group meeting following the conference. |
| 2.12 | Subsequent Core Groups meetings must be held at least every 6 weeks. More frequent meetings may be required according to the needs of the child. |
3. Formulation of Child Protection Plan
| 3.1 | Working Together to Safeguard Children 2010 (para.5.2224) states that 'the overall aim of the Child Protection Plan is to:
|
| 3.2 | Parents must be enabled to understand:
|
| 3.3 | All parties must be clear about the respective roles and responsibilities of family members and different agencies in implementing the plan. |
| 3.4 | The plan will be outlined at the conference. The Lead Social Worker and the Core Group are responsible for ensuring it is drawn up in detail and acted upon. |
| 3.5 | The Core Group will, as described above, regularly review and where necessary modify the Child Protection Plan. |
| 3.6 | The Child Protection Plan will constitute an agenda item at each review conference. |
| 3.7 | The Child Protection Plan should be used to clarify expectations and assist in joint working towards shared goals. It can also be used as evidence, in any legal proceedings of the efforts made to work in partnership (this must be made clear to parents). |
|
|
| 3.8 | An outline plan, for each child, must be drawn up at initial and review conferences, following any decision that a child should have or continue to have a Child Protection Plan. |
| 3.9 | The aim of the outline plan is to assist the Core Group to form a clearer focus of work with the family and to explicitly define individual professional responsibilities. |
| 3.10 | The outline plan should identify:
|
| 3.11 | The planned interventions should address:
|
| 3.12 | The outline plan should include an indication of what the conference believes needs to change before the Child Protection Plan can be discontinued. |
| 3.13 | There should be no reduction in service level or significant change to the Child Protection Plan without child protection conference approval. |
|
|
| 3.14 | The Core Group is responsible for drawing up in more detail the Child Protection Plan for each child. |
| 3.15 | Contents of the plan should be based on findings of the Core Assessment and decisions of the child protection conference and should cover:
|
| 3.16 | The planned interventions should additionally address:
|
| 3.17 | If the plan's contents have not been discussed with any of the parties / agencies concerned, the reasons must be stated on the plan. |
| 3.18 | Any dissent about the plan, by family or professionals, must be recorded, with reasons. |
|
|
| 3.19 | The plan must consider the wishes and feelings of the child. It must be explained to her/him (in accordance with age and development), using an interpreter if required. |
| 3.20 | The child should be given a copy of the plan written at a level appropriate to her/his understanding and in her/his preferred language and be provided with the opportunity to record her/his comments, including areas of disagreement. |
|
|
| 3.21 | The plan must consider the views of the parents, insofar as they are consistent with the child's welfare. Parents should be provided with the opportunity to record their comments, including areas of disagreement. |
| 3.22 | Parents should be clear about the evidence of Significant Harm, which resulted in the child becoming the subject of a Child Protection Plan, what needs to change and what is expected of them and professionals as part of implementing the plan. They should be given a copy of the plan in their preferred language. |
| 3.23 | The family must be told about its right to complain and the procedure for so doing. |
|
|
| 3.24 | The Lead Social Worker will distribute the revised Child Protection Plan to Core Group members and the Conference Chair within five working days of the Core Group meeting. |
|
|
| 3.25 | All agencies are responsible for the implementation of the Child Protection Plan and all professionals must ensure they are able to deliver their commitments, or if not possible, that these are re-negotiated. |
4. Lead Social Worker Role
| 4.1 | At every Initial Child Protection Conference or pre-birth conference, where a decision is made that a child should be the subject of a Child Protection Plan, the chair will name a qualified social worker, identified by the social work team/group manager, to fulfil the role of Lead Social Worker for the child. |
| 4.2 | The Lead Social Worker should:
|
| 4.3 | The frequency of Lead Social Worker contact above is the minimum standard. |
| 4.4 | In exceptional circumstances the Core Group may decide that the required contact level should be less frequent that stated in 4.2. Any such decision should be authorised by Children's Social Care line manager / child protection adviser. |
| 4.5 | If the Lead Social Worker has difficulty obtaining direct access to the child, the Children's Social Care line manager must be informed, as well as other Core Group members. |
| 4.6 | In these circumstances formal agreement must be reached that a member of another agency carry out the face-to-face contact, or that a review conference is called. Such a decision must be recorded, authorised by managers of the agencies concerned and agreed in the Child Protection Plan. |
|
|
| 4.7 | The Lead Social Worker must maintain a complete and up-to-date signed record on the social care record, to include:
|
|
|
| 4.8 | The Lead Social Worker is responsible, in liaison with the child protection chair and administrator, for convening the Review Child Protection Conference, the dates for which should have been set at the previous conference and be no more than:
|
| 4.9 | Consideration should be given to bringing forward the date of a review conference in the following circumstances:
|
| 4.10 | The request to bring forward the date of a review conference should be made by a Strategy Discussion/Meeting of a Section 47 enquiry or by the social worker following consultation with Core Group members, conference chair, and must be authorised by the team/group manager. |
|
|
| 4.11 | It is the responsibility of the Lead Social Worker, in liaison with the social work manager to ensure that clear cover arrangements are made when the Lead Social Worker is absent on planned annual leave, training etc. |
| 4.12 | Parents and child must be informed of planned absences, the cover and contact arrangements. |
5. Children's Social Care Team/Group Manager Role
| 5.1 | The team/group manager has a vital role in managing the progress of the case and supporting the Lead Social Worker. |
| 5.2 | The manager should:
|
|
|
| 5.3 | The manager must arrange cover for the Lead Social Worker in case of sickness and ensure arrangements are in place when the Lead Social Worker is on annual leave and training, including the checking and any necessary action, resulting from post, e-mails and telephone contacts. |
| 5.4 | If the Lead Social Worker is to be absent from work for an extended period her / his manager should consider reallocating the case. |
6. Further Assessment
| 6.1 | The Lead Social Worker and team/ group manager must, in supervision, regularly consider the risks to the child and whether further core or specialist assessments should be undertaken. |
| 6.2 | Further assessments may be helpful in the following circumstances:
|
7. Intervention
| 7.1 | Intervention must be provided to give the child and family the best opportunities of achieving the required changes, identifying and developing the strengths within the family. |
| 7.2 | If a child cannot be cared for safely at home, s/he will need to be placed elsewhere whilst work is undertaken with both child and family. In these circumstances, consideration must be given to identifying alternative safe placements in the child's family and community. |
| 7.3 | Intervention should address the child's needs and may involve action to promote her or his health, development and safety, particularly with regard to the need to develop a secure parent-child attachment. |
| 7.4 | Critically, decision making must consider if the child's developmental needs can be responded to within the family and within timescales appropriate for that child. |
| 7.5 | See Chapter 4 of the Assessment Framework (DH 2000) for guidance on decisions about interventions. |
8. Death of a Child Subject to a Child Protection Plan
| 8.1 | When a child who is subject to a Child Protection Plan dies, from whatever cause, the Lead Social Worker or her/his manager must immediately inform the child protection co-ordinator who will notify the chair of the LSCB. |
| 8.2 | See Notification of Serious Child Care Incidents Procedure and Serious Case Review Procedure respectively for details of notification arrangements of serious child care incidents and criteria for Serious Case Reviews. |
| 8.3 | If it appears likely to the designated safeguarding manager that a serious case review will be initiated, s/he may arrange for the child's file to be secured (see Serious Case Review Procedure). |
9. Family Group Conferences
| 9.1 | A Family Group Conference (FGC) is a meeting in which family members themselves, including children and young people, design their own plan to overcome identified problems and to respond to the concerns of professionals. |
| 9.2 | The FGC is convened by an independent co-ordinator, not directly responsible for assessing or providing services to the family, who ensures relevant family and friends are invited and adequately prepared. Children are actively encouraged to attend and may be supported by an advocate. |
| 9.3 | The meeting has 3 stages: Information exchange, private family time and planning. |
| 9.4 | Agencies and professionals should agree to support the family's plan if it does not place the child at risk of Significant Harm and if the requested resources can be provided. |
| 9.5 | There may be subsequent review meetings to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of the plan. |
|
|
| 9.6 | Where possible, FGC's should be considered for Children in Need at an early stage i.e. for cases that have not reached the threshold of child protection. They can also be used after this threshold has been identified. |
| 9.7 | Circumstances when a FGC might be appropriate include where:
|
|
|
| 9.8 | FGCs may also be used for children who have been the subject of a Section 47 Enquiry or Child Protection Conference. They do not replace or remove the need for a child protection conference, which should always be held when the relevant criteria are met. |
| 9.9 | The social worker should consult with police prior to a referral to the FGC project if a criminal investigation is ongoing or prosecution pending. |
| 9.10 | In cases where drug / alcohol use is prevalent or there is inter-generational sexual abuse, caution should be used when considering use of FGCs, especially if denial and collusion are identified as features of the extended family dynamics. This should not prevent discussion with the FGC project, but there must be clarity about the levels of risk. |
| 9.11 | Consideration should be given to referral to a FGC at each child protection conference, as family circumstances change and a referral may become appropriate at any stage in the child protection process. |
| 9.12 | There will be occasions when the family's plan reduces risks of Significant Harm to the child, such that a Child Protection Plan will no longer be needed. On these occasions the team/group manager must decide whether a review conference be convened to consider discontinuing the Child Protection Plan. |
|
|
| 9.13 | Parents / carers with Parental Responsibility need to give their permission for information in relation to themselves and the children to be shared with extended family members. |
| 9.14 | Effective planning within FGCs relies on the provision of accurate information for the family, who need to understand that they are the primary planning group in the process. The family and involved professionals should be clear about:
|
End





